“Run Your Own Race”

I’ve been running the Standard Chartered Singapore Marathon (SCSM) for three years. Each time running SCSM, I understand this slogan more.

Due to this year work/study/travel, my training for this year SCSM was barely enough. Starting only 8 weeks before the race, on average 20KM/week, peaked 45KM/week. As a result, my strategy was to run at 4:00 pace until 25KM and decide to maintain the pace or slow down for a safer speed. I was also monitoring my heart rate from the start. By the time I reached 25KM, I was still running @ 11Km/h. But my heart rate monitor reading showed that my heart rate over 90% of the max. If continued running at this speed, there is a risk I may cramp or exhaust before reaching the ending point. However tempted by sub 4 result, I tried to maintain the speed till around 28KM and decided to let it be and enjoy my race.

For the rest distance, I used it as an examining of my hydration/dehydration process. At 35KM point, I stopped by the road to help stretch runner who had cramp. Accelerated again at 40 KM, I finally reached the end point as fast/slow as my maiden marathon in 2006 and much slower than last year. This was also my first full marathon without cramp.

SGAU1807[1]  SGAW0373[1] 

After the race and the massage, met with a few friends from SGrunners for group photo and joined other friends for lunch. When finally retured home and had a rest, I heard the shocking news one of my fellow runners, who runs regularly and  participated the half marathon, collapsed at 18KM and was sent to hospital by ambulance. Luckily, not too serious after receiving treatment. This is the first time such accident happens to someone close to me. Following last year’s fatal accident in SBR2007, I always tell all friends training with me to run safe and train enough before race. For people like us, who has no chance (or a chance smaller than winning a Toto) winning a top place in such running events, finishing safe is always the first priority. "Impossible is nothing" "Just do it", dun be fooled by such slogans. One thing you must keep in mind: the cost for breaking the limit might be your own life and happiness to your entire family and circle. "Run Your Own Race", there is nothing more precise than this.

431710878_vs92c-O[1]

TIME: 4h:25m:14s (gun) / 4h:24m:40s (net)

Result in Gender (Male) – 988th place, 9552 finishers behind. About 9% of finishers ahead

apple,iphone 及其它

前几天和朋友在论坛谈起apple,顺便编辑下放博客里,以示更新。。(space又变风格了。。。老了,跟不上潮流了。又得适应一段时间。。)

首先声明,我既不是apple fan也不是偏执的anti-apple,这里仅从一个消费者理性的角度探讨一下。(所使用过的apple产品: apple TV   落灰中,ipod video (记不清几代了) 落灰中)

我一向认为apple的产品自成体系,有特色,但离完美还差太远。即使和其他一些厂商比也是输多胜少性价比很低(商业上或许相反)。

本来打算买台iphone 3G的,原计划作Xmas gift。。但随着了解到iphone无法播放flash(这倒是小事,我用的也少。据传是Jobs (apple CEO)个人喜好问题,不确认),无法拍video,更发指的是无法发MMS, 无法转发短信,无法复制粘贴内容!如果需要实现以上手机本应有的基本功能,那么就需要经过hack或者各种其他第三方软件还不一定都能解决,这与apple一向忽悠的易用性相左。我相信给我台iphone,这些功能我折腾折腾也应该能部分解决。不过何苦在其他手机性价比更高的情况下扔钱给Jobs呢? 因此apple的漂亮是依据主观在于个人的,易用则是相对的,而且对不少人来说代价太大,这里代价不单指价格,还有功能和折腾的时间。唯一客观的就是低性价比。

假设万一某一天Jobs说打电话是个多于的功能,用WiFi + Skype就行,这才是未来的方向,那么。。。假设。。仅仅是个假设。。其实也不完全是个假设,apple的Macbook Air笔记本不就没有网线接口么。人家说Wifi代表了未来的方向,什么USB, LAN能没有就没有了。咱们apple要的是薄,外形要能电死人。笔记本温度高点无所谓,烫不死人就行了)

这里再单独说一下apple一贯所缺失的FM功能。之所以要单独说,因为我个人的使用习惯不符合前面提到的大多数理性消费者。。。FM对我来说比mp3功能要重要的多。基本上我室外听FM,室内听CD。我以小人之心揣测一下,Jobs一定是还指望itune卖mp3,也就当然不能让你舒舒服服听上FM。

总体来讲,apple过于自我,不会通过产品来对消费者期望做出反应,而是想尽办法让消费者适应自己的产品。因此有时是好的,例如ipod的成功,但有时则让人无法容忍。跟定apple就像赌博Jobs是上帝派来领导消费电子的大使。因此根据统计学基本原理,这个万恶的资本主义企业是不能代表广大消费者利益的。

我想Jobs眼里的apple消费者应该都是粉丝而不是上帝,呵呵

另一家比较自我的公司就是SONY,有趣的是正是由于SONY若干年前固执的推MD而不是mp3,令apple有机可乘,成就了ipod。也让apple从垂死中走出,重新回到消费电子类。如果当初SONY早点悔悟,那么以walkman的金子招牌,apple恐怕很难撼动整个市场。而现在apple自己称王一方,估计也怕下一次消费电子革命被别人篡位?

我个人更喜欢IBM PC系统, Philips CD这些胸怀广阔,开放的厂商。
不喜欢非常自我的厂商,一上船就把你绑住,用了一件他家的还只能继续跟着他们走。

开放的厂商需要的是广阔的胸怀和长远的视野。
IBM开放了PC系统,最终不造PC了,Philips作为CD发明厂家也不生产CD机了。但生产PC,CD的还大有厂在。(这TMD是一种什么样的精神,这就是传说中的国际主义精神。。。才怪,这两家其实是发现PC和CD没apple忽尤来钱快,放弃PC CD生产了)。通过充分竞争,价格也更合理。这就是开放系统带给广大消费者的好处。

反观apple,消费者买了产品就只能以后等着他们更新软件/硬件。期望着软件/硬件改进能实现本应有的基本功能, 就如同虔诚的信徒期待着上帝Jobs给与恩赐(例如复制粘贴和开放FM,这两个功能从iphone发布到现在快两年了吧。我是不能相信apple有诚意解决消费者问题的了,一般手机更换周期才两年)。换了开放的厂商,你apple不做,立刻就会有其他厂商跟进,更不用说强大的山寨主们。

apple过于强调品牌/风格,这是时尚/奢侈品的本质。一块名表带几辈子,一件大衣穿xx年,apple哪个产品可以?(这里只针对绝大多数理性和不理性的消费者,不包括收藏家) 消费电子产品,功能才是最重要的!风格应该建立在基本功能完全实现的基础上。

所以,喜欢apple的继续apple,喜欢orange的继续orange~